However, perhaps controversially, arguably this is more of a pro than a con – as the saying goes, opposites attract!
And there’s no sense in ruling someone out for reasons that may become insignificant once you’ve met in real life.
A full 1,600 men would have unknowingly discounted this amazing person because of 2.5cm of extra leg length – and she would have continued to find internet dating limited and unsuccessful.
It is 100s of questions long and asks many probing questions about religion and moral views.
Some find this a barrier to join, fans say it weeds out the casual chancer from those truly looking for love – and means you don’t have to wait to broach tricky topics.
And, by the way, the tick-box that chooses whether you’re shown people with children or not can have an even more dramatic result, with 90% of the people I asked (a straw poll of 10 in the office) saying they’d chosen not to be shown people with children.
Yet many friends of mine who had previously ruled out anyone with children on a dating site are now happily dating (or married to) single parents they met in real life.
But size isn’t everything – as anyone who has just wrapped up a three-hour swiping session on Tinder will attest.
Too many members with no filter can result in either hours of swiping to find someone you fancy, or hundreds of messages in your inbox that you’ll never have time to read. We will tell you what you need in a relationship, where you screwed up (without knowing it) in past relationships and a customized action plan to make your next relationship successful.This week marks the biggest online dating week of the year (combined with the biggest divorce week of the year).Pricier – it’s £44.95 for a month, but that drops to £12.95 per month if you sign up for a year.You can’t browse pictures or profiles – you wait to be matched by the mystery algorithm after answering the 400 questions – then you are guided through a contact process.One 5ft 10in friend reports she saw only 400 potential men to browse when she logged in to